All 2 Debates between Dan Poulter and Mark Reckless

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dan Poulter and Mark Reckless
Tuesday 24th February 2015

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless (Rochester and Strood) (UKIP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Medway clinical commissioning group is looking at putting GPs at the front of our accident and emergency department to help relieve pressures on emergency doctors. Do Ministers believe that that is a promising way forward?

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

There is certainly a lot of benefit from having general practice co-located alongside A and E so that people with more minor ailments or concerns can be seen by GPs. That can often take the pressure off A and E services, but more senior expertise is also on hand when required.

National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill

Debate between Dan Poulter and Mark Reckless
Friday 21st November 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that that is probably correct. I may be guilty of having believed the undertakings I was given by those on the Government Front Bench.

Dan Poulter Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Dr Daniel Poulter)
- Hansard - -

It might be helpful for the hon. Gentleman to bear in mind the words of his colleague, the hon. Member for Clacton (Douglas Carswell), who said:

“Never one to slavishly support the party line, I would be quite prepared to oppose these reforms”—

the 2012 Act—

“if I felt they were a step back. But I won’t. These changes are necessary—and contrary to much of the mainstream media coverage, in my experience they are quietly supported by many doctors too.”

Does the hon. Gentleman support what his colleague said, or does he not?

Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that my hon. Friend the Member for Clacton (Douglas Carswell) was right in saying that some doctors supported the Bill that became the 2012 Act. During the early stages of that Bill, a number of representative bodies supported it, or were presented as doing so. As the Bill proceeded, however, some of what had been claimed to be support from organisations such as the British Medical Association seemed to fall away. I believe that the Bill ran to 460 pages.

The problem was the way in which legislation is made in the House. The coalition agreement promised us a House business committee, but no such committee deals with the allocation of time for legislation. We have a Committee of Selection, but it is run by the usual channels—the Whips on either side of the House—and people with expertise such as the hon. Member for Totnes (Dr Wollaston), who might actually have improved the Bill, were excluded from it.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

I feel I should quote further from what was said by the hon. Member for Clacton, when much of the Committee stage of the Health and Social Care Bill had been completed. He went on to say—on 11 February 2012, on his TalkCarswell.com website—

“If these proposals were defeated, it would be a setback for all those of us who would like to see public service reform. We need to keep our nerve.”

That rather contradicts what the hon. Member for Rochester and Strood (Mark Reckless) has just said, does it not?

Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is an excellent website, which I recommend to all Members. The Minister has said that my hon. Friend made those observations when most of the Committee stage of the Bill had been completed. Was that during the “pause” that had been invented as a new mechanism for Parliament? My hon. Friend is not here at the moment, but I think he would agree with me that the 2012 Act is not as it was billed to us by those on the Government Front Bench. It has led to an extraordinary degree of additional complexity in the NHS, and the introduction of competition bodies—and, in particular, European competition law—into the NHS is not welcome.

--- Later in debate ---
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

I have just dealt with it, and I am going to make a little progress.

I want to deal with the contribution made by the hon. Member for Rochester and Strood (Mark Reckless). He failed to address the issues that I had raised earlier about the support that the hon. Member for Clacton (Douglas Carswell), his party colleague, gave to the Health and Social Bill—now the Health and Social Care Act. In fact, as the right hon. Member for Leigh (Andy Burnham) said, the hon. Member for Clacton thought that the reforms did not go far enough. Indeed, the leader of his party is on record as talking about the need, in effect, to privatise our NHS. I would like to reaffirm the commitment that that will absolutely never happen under this Government or any Conservative Government.

Another important point needs to be made. Earlier this week, the hon. Member for Rochester and Strood expressed frankly unacceptable and distasteful views on repatriation. We must of course bear in mind that 40% of staff in our NHS come from very diverse, multicultural backgrounds. We very much value the contribution that doctors, nurses and health care staff from all over the world make to our NHS. I do not want to see those people repatriated; I want to see them continuing to deliver high-quality care for patients in our NHS—something that UKIP clearly opposes.

Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have made absolutely no such remarks; I have said only that we wanted such people to be able to stay. The disgraceful remarks were actually made by the Conservative candidate, who juxtaposed the issues of unlimited immigration and fear of crime.

--- Later in debate ---
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I am sure that Members in all parts of the House—although perhaps not the hon. Member for Rochester and Strood—would like to reaffirm their commitment to and the value they place on all NHS staff, no matter what background or culture they come from. We want those staff to continue to practise in and work for our NHS to the benefit of patients.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

I think that the hon. Gentleman has said quite enough already, and I need to make some progress.

Let me move on to the second, substantive, point in this debate, on which I hope there will be a large amount of agreement. It was articulated—

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. The Minister is not giving way.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker.

The point was articulated very well by my right hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Sir Tony Baldry) in one of the best and most accurate speeches of this Parliament in an NHS debate.

Mark Reckless Portrait Mark Reckless
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. The Minister has made a false allegation to which he has not given me the right of reply. Of course I welcome all those immigrants in the NHS. They are very welcome and we want them to stay as much as he does.