Housing White Paper Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Crispin Blunt

Main Page: Crispin Blunt (Independent - Reigate)

Housing White Paper

Crispin Blunt Excerpts
Tuesday 7th February 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The White Paper contains several measures to deal with that. There is no easy answer, but there can sometimes be good reasons, such as if a developer has another project to go on once it finishes the current one. Some developers do take too long to turn planning permission into homes, however, so the measures in the White Paper include changes to completion notices and the ability to attach conditions to planning permission. We are also consulting on a new measure for large developments to allow local authorities to take into account a developer’s track record.

Crispin Blunt Portrait Crispin Blunt (Reigate) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will my right hon. Friend confirm that it is still Government policy that London’s green belt is a priceless asset for both the nation and London? Will he further confirm that if a local authority ducks difficult decisions and fails to produce a local plan, it cannot short-cut its way out of that through a £2.5 billion development where the green belt is at its narrowest around London, earning a nice little £1 billion for the developer and the landowner?

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It would be inappropriate for me to discuss a particular planning application, but I can confirm that protections for green belt are as strong as ever. In fact, the White Paper sets out for the first time much more clearly the steps that we expect a local authority to take before it even considers the green belt, including having to show that it has looked at all reasonable alternatives.