Point of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Point of Order

Lord Grayling Excerpts
Thursday 4th February 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Leader of the House wish to respond?

Lord Grayling Portrait The Leader of the House of Commons (Chris Grayling)
- Hansard - -

Can I just say that the shadow Leader of the House is talking absolute nonsense?

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Right. Pursuant to the hon. Gentleman’s point of order, I can say only, at this stage, that I have no knowledge of the matter. I heard what the Leader of the House has said. I think it is a fair point to make to the House as a whole that it is not obligatory, but it is desirable, for words uttered to be genuinely meant. On one or two occasions in the past, I have come across language used such as “Second Reading of a Bill” which turns out really just to be a kind of holding statement, if you will, and what eventually transpires is something somewhat different—perhaps quite specifically not a Bill, and not a Second Reading of a Bill, but something else. On a serious note, in terms of the intelligibility of the proceedings of the House and the transparency with which we operate, I know that the Leader of the House will want to hold himself to a rather higher standard than that, and I am sure we can be assured of that.