All 2 Debates between Chloe Smith and John Stevenson

Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [Lords]

Debate between Chloe Smith and John Stevenson
Tuesday 17th November 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

I am interested in that argument. Although it is for the Minister to give the real answer on that, rather than for me to attempt to give it, I think we run a risk of creating a patchwork. I do not feel comfortable with 16-year-olds in one part of the country being able to do something that their counterparts in another part of the country cannot. I am not hugely comfortable with the inconsistency, and I would far prefer us to debate this in the round properly.

John Stevenson Portrait John Stevenson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. Friend that this is not the right forum for the discussion on reducing the voting age to include 16 and 17-year-olds. Does she agree that if that other debate ever were to come forward, it would have to include things such as the alcohol age and whether 16 and 17-year-olds should be able to have executive power, so that there is consistency?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

I agree entirely. In fact, the next section of my notes tells me to acknowledge the points made by my hon. Friend about executive power and standing for office. We should also go through all the points relating to marriage, joining the armed forces, taxation, the use of substances, criminal responsibility and the age of consent for sex. They are all items in that much longer list. Before the Minister looks at me with absolute horror for moving his Bill on to something that is not included here today, I should say that I merely make those points to make the broader debate a real one. As my right hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Mark Field) said when he was in his place earlier, we need to have that debate, and we might hope to do so in the next couple of years, because the topic is important.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Chloe Smith and John Stevenson
Tuesday 4th June 2013

(11 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chloe Smith Portrait Miss Smith
- Hansard - -

As I think I have made clear, this is about third parties more generally, and it is right to understand how third parties can influence the political process in general. It is something in which the general public will take a great interest.

John Stevenson Portrait John Stevenson (Carlisle) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Minister agree that trade unions are also lobbyists, so if legislation is to be brought forward, they should be included in it?

Chloe Smith Portrait Miss Smith
- Hansard - -

I think that our legislative proposals will allow ample opportunity for that and other issues to be discussed. It has been shown in the last few days that there is enormous public concern about the external influences that can arise in relation to people who make laws, and I think it right for third parties and undue influence to be considered.