Troubled Families Programme

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Tuesday 10th March 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady is the author of a very good report on the subject of child sexual exploitation, and she and I discussed this matter at a seminar last week at Downing street. She makes a very reasonable point. I think the reason the programme has had a fair amount of success is that it does not deal with this problem through social services or the benefits agency alone. There have to be different disciplines in the room. The same applies to tackling child sexual exploitation. Social work is very well set up and very good at dealing with child sexual exploitation within a family; when the problem involves organised crime, it becomes more difficult to deal with. I think the point she made at the seminar is this: who would have thought that we would need to regulate taxis and the night-time economy to deal with child sexual exploitation? A broader approach will bring much better co-ordination and the greatest chance of success. I agree with her.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I, too, congratulate the Secretary of State on his vision, persistence and leadership in seeing through this very important programme that helps to change lives and transform people’s prospects. Will he tell the House how many children have benefited from this programme and will now be able to fulfil their true and fullest potential?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Time will tell how many children will benefit in the end. Getting children back into school and attending three successive terms makes a big difference. In my hon. Friend’s area, the total number of families we would describe as troubled is 2,560. Some 80% have been turned around. So far, just short of £10 million has been expended in that process.

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Tuesday 4th November 2014

(9 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The conflation is made worse by the fact that the head of paid services is an interim appointment. An interim appointee does not have the same authority as someone who has their feet well and truly under the table, which is why, should we decide to use commissioners, it would be a priority to get a person in place who cannot be removed without their permission. The hon. Gentleman will have heard that, should I decide to act, we are setting up a framework whereby things come into being if the principal officer’s advice is ignored. That is where things are important.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Some 20 years ago, I was elected to Lambeth council on a mandate to fight corruption. In that struggle, I found that it is a many-headed hydra and that these cultures are long in the making. Mayor Rahman has been running Tower Hamlets since 2008. Is it not right that there should be accounting as to how long this has been going on and how widespread the problem is?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

One certainly wants to root out corruption, no matter where it took place and how long ago—that is fundamentally important. But the priority, should I decide to act, is to give the people of Tower Hamlets the opportunity to make a proper informed decision about their council and the mayor whereby, first, their votes would count, secondly, their voices will be heard and, thirdly, fairness will be there.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Monday 8th September 2014

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have had an opportunity to see this very close up and am very firmly of the opinion that the way in which this is dealt with now, through gold command, and with the firefighters, the Environment Agency and the police working together, is by far the best system.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T8. May I welcome the massive support the Department has given to coastal communities like mine in Dover and Deal, and the great backing to high streets, of which Deal’s is officially and definitively the best in the country?

Amendment of the Law

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is indeed true that we are a well-upholstered Department.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Is not the key difference that instead of quangos such as the RDAs running amok across the country doing nothing, we will see enterprise zones and pro-business, pro-growth planning policies that will get the country going again properly?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely correct—so much so that I am delighted to tell him that I will refer to that in a few moments.

The regional bureaucratic approach is not only costly but does not do the job it is supposed to do. Instead, we want to see business men and business women playing a leading role in the debate about their local economy, helping all parts of the country to live up to their full economic potential.

More than 90% of people in England now live in areas with local enterprise partnerships. These partnerships are a new approach to economic development, putting local councils, local communities and local business in the driving seat. The partnerships established so far have already set out plans that are high on ambition and low on bureaucracy—plans to attract investment, boost tourism and strengthen transport links. Local enterprise partnerships are going for growth, not handing out grants. The 21 new enterprise zones are an opportunity for leading partnerships to take their work to a new level. In exchange, we will let them keep all business rate growth in their zones for at least 25 years.

Businesses in the enterprise zones will benefit from a discount of up to 100% on rates and access to superfast broadband. We will work closely with local partners to make sure that the zones do not simply displace jobs and business. For example, the Boots campus in Nottingham will be a centre for science and medical research and innovation, the Manchester airport zone will be ideally placed to make the most of the local science and engineering expertise and international transport links, and Liverpool Waters will keep up the momentum of economic growth in that resurgent English city.

It is not just enterprise zones that are being helped: the Budget extends the doubling of small business rate relief for a second year. This will help small firms and small shops across the country, given that business rates are the third biggest outgoing for firms after staff and rents.

Local Government Finance

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Wednesday 9th February 2011

(13 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In a moment.

The hon. Member for Dudley North has to understand that these are local decisions. We have ensured that there are sufficient funds to protect the vulnerable, but ultimately local councils have to make local decisions.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does the Secretary of State agree that we are hearing a confused argument from the Opposition, but that it seems to involve a spending commitment of about £7 billion? That money would surely have to be made up through about 2p on income tax, would it not?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is of course perfectly right. The Opposition seem to think that it is magic money, but it would actually come out of people’s pockets through business rates or income tax. The reason why we are in this position is that the guilty people on the Labour Benches allowed things to get out of hand.

Localism Bill

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Monday 17th January 2011

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Voluntary groups in Huddersfield, which I know and love very well, are very keen on those powers. They will have a power to challenge and a power for a proper partnership that is not hand-to-mouth and based on grants and handouts. In such partnerships, sensible local authorities will work hand in glove with voluntary organisations to provide better services for their population.

Let me give another example. People will be able to veto excessive council tax rises. Instead of the Secretary of State making that decision, local people will balance service needs against the level of council tax. They will be able to protect and improve—and even run—the public services on which they rely, and ensure that much-loved local assets are kept for the next generation. Those rights will give community groups the oomph that they need. People will have a genuine stake in their community and a reason to get involved, secure in the knowledge that the power to change things is in their hands.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

This is a truly radical Bill from a truly radical Secretary of State. It brings closer to reality the dream of government for the people, by the people and of the people that shall not perish from this earth. In my constituency, people want to buy the port of Dover. People in other constituencies want to buy forests and other such community assets. Will the Secretary of State and the Government consider going faster, deeper and wider, so that we have a community right to buy from central Government as well as from local government?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend tempts me to become a bit Maoist in these matters, but we will certainly consider what he says and look towards giving greater powers to local people.

The Bill will return the planning system to the people. Targets do not build homes, and regional plans do not get communities involved. Today, we have an adversarial, confrontational system, fomented on mistrust and a sense of powerlessness. It is simply not working. The Bill will therefore create genuine neighbourhood planning, by which the community will develop in ways that make sense for local people. Instead of instructions being handed down from on high, the Bill will offer incentives to invest in growth. Instead of unelected commissioners making national decisions on important national infrastructure, those choices will again be down to democratically elected Ministers in this House.

Local Government Finance

Debate between Charlie Elphicke and Lord Pickles
Monday 13th December 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman would be better to can the abuse and read the plain English guide to the settlement, which I commend to him because it demonstrates that what he just said is nonsense.

Charlie Elphicke Portrait Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does the Secretary of State share my sadness that such a tough local government settlement was necessitated because the previous Government shattered the public finances? Despite that, can he confirm that he has found £650 million to ensure that council tax is frozen next year in Dover and Deal and across England?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am delighted to respond to my hon. Friend and to say that the council tax freeze will offer substantial protection to his constituents, who have worked hard and paid through the nose for council services over the years, seeing enormous increases under Labour. I am delighted that we can offer that additional money to freeze council tax.