Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme: Spending Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Rawlings

Main Page: Baroness Rawlings (Conservative - Life peer)

Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme: Spending

Baroness Rawlings Excerpts
Tuesday 24th November 2020

(3 years, 12 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Asked by
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

To ask the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body how much money is being spent on the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme per week; and what is it being spent on.

Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the spokesperson of the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body is the noble Baroness, Lady Scott of Needham Market.

Baroness Scott of Needham Market Portrait Baroness Scott of Needham Market (LD) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in accordance with the annual estimate agreed by the commissions of both Houses, weekly spend to date has been £1.8 million. The current spend includes thorough surveys to fully understand the condition of the Palace, gathering detailed data to help inform the design options, and the scoping and costing of those options.

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

I thank the noble Baroness for her Answer. Is HMG, through the sponsor board, really spending £2 million a week on this R&R project, as asserted by the PAC report? The late David Frost would have called this “monopoly money”, as he did in “Frost over England”, and £2 million is a huge amount of taxpayers’ money. Can the noble Baroness tell your Lordships exactly what it is being spent on? Is it fees for architects and other professionals who have been working on the restoration and renewal programme since 2017 and still are in 2020? Can the noble Baroness tell your Lordships the budget figures for 2021? If they are unavailable, could she explain why? If she does not have them now, could she look into this later?