Adult Social Care: Challenge Procedures Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Department of Health and Social Care
Baroness Pitkeathley
Main Page: Baroness Pitkeathley (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Pitkeathley's debates with the Department of Health and Social Care
Adult Social Care: Challenge Procedures
Baroness Pitkeathley Excerpts(1 year, 9 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Markham (Con)
The main point is that we already have two levels of appeal. In the first instance, someone can appeal to a local authority and if they are not satisfied with that, they can appeal to the local ombudsman. Thousands of people do this every year, and compliance in terms of replies to them is very high. I must admit that I am not sure whether an additional, third level of appeal is really necessary in this case.
Baroness Pitkeathley (Lab)
My Lords, once again, a Question in your Lordships’ House has pointed out the inadequacy of the social care system, be it funding or personnel. In answer to an earlier Question, the Minister teased the House a little about the workforce strategy. Can he be more specific in answer to this Question?
Lord Markham (Con)
First, I take issue with the inadequacy comment. Some 89% of people expressed a high level of satisfaction with the social care provided, which, although not 100%, is pretty good, as I think everyone would agree. As I said, the workplace plan has been drafted. I am afraid I cannot give an exact date of publication—I believe there are local purdah issues now—but I can say that it will be soon.