Dog Licensing Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Oppenheim-Barnes
Main Page: Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes's debates with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
(10 years, 10 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord De Mauley
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord De Mauley 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, I know that the noble Lord is a staunch campaigner on doggie matters. What we are doing—he referred to this—and which goes a long way to achieving what people want from a licensing scheme, is introducing compulsory microchipping under which the record of a dog’s ownership will be maintained on a database.
 Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes (Con)
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, does my noble friend not agree—especially as it comes from someone he would describe as a doggie person—that microchipping is particularly important where dangerous dogs are involved, such as dogs listed in the recent Dangerous Dogs Act?