Media: Ownership Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve

Main Page: Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve (Crossbench - Life peer)

Media: Ownership

Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve Excerpts
Monday 10th October 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Ryder asks a fascinating and important question. In determining the appropriate size of media ownership, we will be considering the extent to which websites should be included. The current rules are outdated and do not even acknowledge the existence of websites, yet websites could conceivably have an important role in controlling access to new sources and have implications for plurality. That is why the Secretary of State has asked Ofcom to look into this matter, and we will consider carefully the recommendations that Lord Justice Leveson makes in this area.

Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve Portrait Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve
- Hansard - -

My Lords, will the noble Baroness tell the House whether, in considering issues of plurality, the Government will also consider issues of diversity, as these are not the same? Plurality does not always guarantee diversity, which is what citizens need.

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, plurality in the context of media ownership refers to the number of owners and size of ownership of different media outlets and does not cover diversity, as the noble Baroness mentioned. I am sure all noble Lords agree that a healthy democracy needs correct information, and, in general, to be able to participate effectively in a political process, access is needed to all sides of the debate. However, this is unlikely to happen if the media are under the control of a too tightly restricted number of owners.