United Kingdom Internal Market Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Morris of Bolton
Main Page: Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Morris of Bolton's debates with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
(4 years ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, I have received a request from the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay of Llandaff, to ask a short question of the Minister.
Does the Minister agree that good governance requires a balanced board but it also requires that each appointee fulfil the person specification as set out to ensure such balance, that they declare any interest in a relevant discussion and that they may have to withdraw during that discussion? That is all laid out for the running of an open and transparent process within a board as well as for an open and transparent appointments process. Does he further agree that it would be an incredibly narrow person specification that expected people to have only one skill, relating only to their devolved Administration experience, and that they would be coming forward with a broad range of skills to complement a balanced board?
I shall now put the Question on Amendment 54. We have heard a Member taking part remotely say that they wish to divide the House in support of the amendment, which I shall take into account.