Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Baroness McDonagh Excerpts
Monday 6th December 2010

(14 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Moved by
20: Clause 1, page 1, leave out lines 8 to 11 and insert—
“Which electoral system would you prefer to use for electing your MP to the House of Commons? Either—
(a) the first past the post system; or(b) the alternative vote system?”
Baroness McDonagh Portrait Baroness McDonagh
- Hansard - -

My Lords, my amendment would change the wording in the Bill, which asks:

“At present, the UK uses the ‘first past the post’ system to elect MPs to the House of Commons. Should the ‘alternative vote’ system be used instead?”,

to:

“Which electoral system would you prefer to use for electing your MP to the House of Commons? Either—

(a) the first past the post system; or (b) the alternative vote system?”.

The reason for this, as any psychologist will tell you, is that yes/no is not neutral. Yes/no has values: yes being good, no being bad. It can also cause confusion depending on whether you ask the question in a positive or a negative way.

A second unintended consequence of the wording is that it gets the voter to fixate on one system which, in the way the sentence is constructed, forces them to focus on the alternative vote system. I believe we are not asking them to choose for or against the alternative vote. In the Bill and in the referendum, we are asking them to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of the first past the post system as against the alternative vote system and then make a choice. For these reasons I think it is much more straightforward if we pose the question in the way it is in the amendment and get people to actually choose the system they would prefer. I beg to move.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Faulkner of Worcester)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I remind the Committee that if this amendment is agreed to I cannot call Amendments 21 to 27 for reasons of pre-emption.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Strathclyde Portrait Lord Strathclyde
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The evidence it had was that first it was alien to referendums that we have had in this country and therefore would need new, comprehensive testing. Additionally, proper assessment of such a question would need to take account of further feedback from interested parties, including political parties and other groups and for those reasons, it took the view that the options style was not as good as the yes/no style.

Baroness McDonagh Portrait Baroness McDonagh
- Hansard - -

Thank you. I think the noble Lord was giving way to me earlier. Can I ask you to go back a little bit to the issue of the campaigns that you touched on? It would seem to me that the way I am proposing it would be much better for campaigns—all the subjects would get aired rather than what is going to happen. You mentioned in your remarks that it will be the case for and against AV that will be concentrated on, not the strengths of the individual systems. Can you go back to this point and expand on it?

Lord Strathclyde Portrait Lord Strathclyde
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that the noble Baroness believes that the option system is better, but the commission’s report noted that an options form of the question could quite significantly affect the nature of the referendum campaign, as campaigns will not be straightforward yes and no campaigns but in favour of either option. The commission believes that for the sake of clarity it is better to campaign on a yes or no basis.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Strathclyde Portrait Lord Strathclyde
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, obviously I cannot commit myself to publishing something if it is unavailable. I said that if it was available, I would make sure that it was published.

Baroness McDonagh Portrait Baroness McDonagh
- Hansard - -

I thank the noble Lord. I intend to withdraw my amendment at this stage. I agree that the referendum should be held, and I think that it is right to have this debate, but I shall think about his comments. If we are not careful, we will have a very one-sided debate in the referendum. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Amendment 20 withdrawn.