Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho

Main Page: Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho (Crossbench - Life peer)

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho Excerpts
Thursday 6th November 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my noble friend and pay tribute to the good work she does in chairing that important committee. I believe that its report is due in January. Once we get that report—which will address things such as safety, control, security, insurance and so—we should be able to analyse and establish what further regulation or control we need to bring in to make this industry safer.

Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho Portrait Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I would hate to suggest for one minute that the United States is in any way more technologically advanced than your Lordships’ Chamber, but both the Supreme Court and the CAA have been wrestling with these challenges. Can I draw the Minister’s attention to Nevada, where they have done some dramatic deregulation of drones, but also to the most recent and first case ever to be brought to the courts on the use of drones in the US? May I also suggest that the ambiguity and complexity of the challenges facing the US could give enormous lessons to us and allow us to become a world leader in our use of regulation?

Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with the noble Baroness. We are at the forefront of this technology and are probably number one in the world. However, we need to make sure that we do not kill the industry by bringing in too much legislation. It is important that this technology makes a good contribution to our GDP and there is long-term potential for trading in it. I am sure that, given time, it will continue to thrive.