UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch Excerpts
Thursday 22nd March 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will need to check to find out precisely what areas that guidance covers. When I have an answer, I will reply to the noble Lord and tell him what I am able to.

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch Portrait Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
- Hansard - -

My Lords, may I follow up the point made by my noble friend Lady McIntosh with a particular example? The Children’s Commissioner recently concluded that the Welfare Reform Bill contravened the UN convention in a number of ways. For example, she argued that the benefit cap risks children suffering unjustified discrimination. In those circumstances, will the Minister explain how the Government took that message on board and went about modifying the legislation to bring it back into line with the convention, because being a signatory does not seem to make much difference to the way in which the legislation eventually pans out?

Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government believe that the Welfare Reform Bill is compliant with the UNCRC. We know that those issues were debated at length in this House and concerns were expressed about the effect of the benefit cap. The Government said that transitional arrangements would be put in place to deal with some of the concerns that noble Lords expressed, and they have committed to having a report a year on as to the effect of the benefit cap. However, our core position is that if we can help and encourage more people into work, that will be good for those families and for their children.