Underoccupancy Charge: Carers Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Hollis of Heigham
Main Page: Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Hollis of Heigham's debates with the Department for Work and Pensions
(10 years, 11 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Freud
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Freud 
        
    
        
    
        This is precisely the kind of circumstance for which the discretionary housing payment is designed. It has not been found possible to have a general rule, and that is why this system, which has gone through the courts in quite some detail, has been found to supply support where necessary.
 Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Lab)
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Lab) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, if, as the Minister suggests, disabled families with family carers are effectively covered by DHPs, why not simply exempt them? If he is wrong—which I suspect he is—why are we, quite knowingly, making lives that are already hard even harder, perhaps thus ensuring that the family carers will themselves become disabled?
 Lord Freud
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Freud 
        
    
        
    
        The courts have gone through this in some detail now and found that it is reasonable for the Secretary of State to take the view that it is not practicable to provide a further exemption for an imprecise class of persons, and that the flexibility of the DHP scheme can be relied upon to provide the additional help.