Energy: Tariffs Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Energy: Tariffs

Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton Excerpts
Monday 30th January 2012

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not sure what I should be reassuring the noble Lord about—whether we should or should not carry on with offshore wind. However, we are committed to offshore wind, if that is the answer that he or anyone else wants. Our numeracy is still very much intact, and I am very grateful for his compliment.

Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton Portrait Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I missed the noble Lord explaining who had sent him the cheque and what reason they gave for sending it. I am sure it was not from redundancy money given to people who have been thrown out of work by the Government’s policy.

Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think the noble Baroness is being a little trite. It comes from a firm called Solar Fusion. No one has yet been made redundant from the solar panel industry, which is alive and well. We have sought to reduce the amount that the consumer pays to help people in the solar industry. For a panel costing £4,000, you can still generate a £500 feed-in tariff benefit—which is more than 10 per cent and in the current market is very good—and a reduction of £190 on your bill. I do not think that there will be redundancies. I think that more of these things will be sold, and that that is good for jobs.