Export Controls Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Falkner of Margravine

Main Page: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (Crossbench - Life peer)

Export Controls

Baroness Falkner of Margravine Excerpts
Monday 28th November 2011

(13 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Wilcox Portrait Baroness Wilcox
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, 2009 was in the previous Government’s time, but I will look back to see if there is anything that I have missed. However, I can tell the noble Lord that at the moment, alongside our EU counterparts, we are supporting the progress of EU restrictions on surveillance software to Syria. All member states have agreed in principle to the prohibition on selling, supplying, transferring or exporting equipment to monitor the internet and telephone communications on mobile or fixed networks. However, surveillance technology is not controlled under our current export-licensing system as it has legitimate applications. For example, it allows companies operating in dangerous locations to monitor the location of staff, and parents to locate their children’s telephone if they are missing. So there are many legitimate uses for this technology. However, we are most certainly looking at it and will report back.

Baroness Falkner of Margravine Portrait Baroness Falkner of Margravine
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the Minister aware of the Foreign Secretary’s statement of 13 October, when he announced a proposal to introduce a mechanism to allow immediate licensing suspension of software and other export items to countries that are experiencing a sharp deterioration? In light of her answer about Creativity Software, have the Government had any discussions with the company since the Foreign Secretary’s statement on 13 October, with a view to suspending its ability to export these items?

Baroness Wilcox Portrait Baroness Wilcox
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that, at the moment, all I know is that the company referred to is exporting quite legitimately, as far as we know. We do not know of any re-exporting involving that company, but certainly we are considering most actively the extent to which export controls should apply to surveillance equipment, particularly in relation to Syria and Iran.