Debates between Baroness Fairhead and Viscount Hailsham during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Wed 23rd Jan 2019
Trade Bill
Lords Chamber

Committee: 2nd sitting (Hansard): House of Lords

Trade Bill

Debate between Baroness Fairhead and Viscount Hailsham
Lord Hannay of Chiswick Portrait Lord Hannay of Chiswick (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Before the noble Baroness goes on to the next amendment, could she answer a question that I asked in the preliminary debate? In the event of us leaving without a deal, what tariff rates will the United Kingdom apply on 30 March to countries with which the European Union has a preferential trading agreement? That agreement will have lapsed as a result of our departure, so we will not be able to keep those tariffs at zero, as they are at now. The MFN rules of the World Trade Organization will say that we are not in a free trade area, a customs union or a preferential agreement with those countries. Have you told these countries what tariffs we are going to apply, and if so, could you tell us?

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

“I will write to the noble Lord”?

Baroness Fairhead Portrait Baroness Fairhead
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I will try to do a little better than that. I can write to clarify, but my understanding is that in the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act arrangements were put in place for the GSP, the GSP+ and the Everything But Arms preference terms. As I keep saying, obviously our aim is to have an agreement and then an implementation period. Should there be no deal—which is not the desired outcome—the UK will need to determine what its policy is. That is not something that I am at liberty to discuss, as it has not been disclosed. Clearly it is not a place we want to go, but we will have to take that into account if we reach that point.

United States Tariffs: Steel and Aluminium

Debate between Baroness Fairhead and Viscount Hailsham
Tuesday 13th March 2018

(6 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Fairhead Portrait Baroness Fairhead
- Hansard - -

Regarding the idea that this is in the national interest, we have been clear that the EU assessment is a safeguard. We are trying to stop this happening in the first place and trying to get exemptions. We are taking this forward through engagement, and we will need to create a list of measures with the EU that we will take on a proportionate basis if we do not progress. My sense is that the best thing we can do is to work on global steel capacity multilaterally. I think that that was the view of this Government and your Lordships’ House, who believe in that rules-based environment.

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my noble friend agree that our response from within the European Union is more effective than it would be from without the European Union?

Baroness Fairhead Portrait Baroness Fairhead
- Hansard - -

It is difficult to argue that one way or the other. I know that the UK has specific national security relationships with the US. We have had a long and enduring relationship on defence, strategy and economic growth, and therefore we have a significant position on our own. I cannot calibrate the difference but I know that we are part of the EU, and on this matter we will be working alongside the EU and following the duty of sincere co-operation.