Debates between Baroness Deech and Lord Wigley during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill

Debate between Baroness Deech and Lord Wigley
Monday 18th March 2013

(11 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Deech Portrait Baroness Deech
- Hansard - -

My Lords, following on from my noble friend’s comments, will the Minister explain how any future Parliament could be stopped from repealing this amendment by a simple majority? There is, as far as I understand it, no such thing as entrenchment in our law because our Parliament is sovereign. Were a future Parliament to become extremely annoyed with excesses of the press in some way or whatever it might be, I cannot see any mechanism for preventing a future Parliament from simply repealing this amendment by a straightforward majority.

Lord Wigley Portrait Lord Wigley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I intervene very briefly to indicate that it is not just the three main parties that have taken an interest in this. To the extent that it has been possible for my colleagues in another place to be in communication with the larger parties, we are grateful to have been in on the arguments.

I added my name to the subsequent bank of amendments, which may or may not be necessary now, so perhaps I may raise two questions to the Minister. First, will any new commission or regulatory body be subject to freedom of information applications? Secondly, can we have an assurance that any arbitration service will be free for claimants to use so that ordinary people can have their opportunity to get redress against being abused by the media?