All 1 Baroness Chakrabarti contributions to the Elderly Social Care (Insurance) Bill [HL] 2021-22

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Fri 16th Jul 2021

Elderly Social Care (Insurance) Bill [HL] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Elderly Social Care (Insurance) Bill [HL]

Baroness Chakrabarti Excerpts
2nd reading
Friday 16th July 2021

(3 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Elderly Social Care (Insurance) Bill [HL] 2021-22 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Chakrabarti Portrait Baroness Chakrabarti (Lab) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I too am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Lilley, for creating this opportunity for such an important debate this morning, but I am afraid that I cannot recommend a rather convoluted homemade attempt at a sticking plaster for the gaping wound that is our national care crisis.

The regressive conceptual contortions that some will go to to avoid the logic of paying for essential public goods by taxing the wealthiest corporations and individuals in our society are almost as ingenious as attempts to privatise such public goods—whether our health data or the desire to care for our vulnerable people—or indeed the highly successful attempts of the wealthiest 1% to avoid paying their fair share of tax.

Our National Health Service is probably the greatest communitarian experiment in world history, and it is so easy to be truly patriotic about it. Given the working people from all over the world who have contributed to it, it encapsulates a positive patriotism that is not remotely xenophobic, yet years of underfunding and its current limits have been cruelly exposed in recent times. Last year, many of our elderly were tipped out of hospitals, untested, into private care homes with inadequate PPE provision, social distancing and testing arrangements, constituting one of the biggest scandals of the Government’s pandemic management—about which the future inquiry will no doubt have much to say.

But this fault-line between health and social care is a more permanent design flaw in a model that cares for the terminal cancer patient at public expense but puts caps, charges and all sorts of constraints on our provision for the patient of identical age and means who is suffering instead from dementia. Such anomalies are only increased with the ageing profile of our population. It is simply unacceptable to leave our older people, or indeed many much younger vulnerable people, isolated, destitute or at the mercy of profiteers who pay too many carers minimum wage on zero-hours contracts.

I look forward to seeing the details of the Government’s plans suggested in the press today, but nothing short of a publicly funded national care service providing rewarding work and dignified care will fit the Bill.