(1 week, 6 days ago)
Lords ChamberI am not sure that I followed the subtlety of that question. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a tried and tested framework, which seeks to ensure that someone—a doctor, for example—has to make a decision about whether a patient is capable of deciding to withdraw from treatment. The doctors will be experienced in doing that and the legal tests have worked over the years. The noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, is right when she says that they are frequently not applied in the correct manner, but in this Bill the key thing is that there are safeguards so that those particular problems will not apply. That is why I am espousing quite strongly keeping the same test for the assisted dying Bill as in the rest of medicine.
I have a practical question. What, then, is the noble and learned Lord going to offer us?
I am not offering anything in the way of a different framework in relation to this. I am more than happy to discuss with people what sort of code of practice there should be. I say that not because I have not been listening—I have been listening as hard as I possibly can; but listening does, from time to time, involve disagreement as well. I apologise for disagreeing, but I do disagree with the two big schemes that have been put by the noble Baronesses, Lady Finlay and Lady Hollins.
(2 weeks, 6 days ago)
Lords ChamberI do not think that it justifies a new equality assessment. The thing about equality assessments is that lawyers can constantly write to clients and say, “You haven’t considered this and you haven’t considered that”. Having read in detail the equality assessment, I say that it deals properly and adequately with the issues.
My Lords, I wonder whether it would be possible to get to the next group of amendments.