Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Apsana Begum Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 10 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am addressing the question about the process in relation to Peter Mandelson. I have set that out in some detail to the House and answered a number of questions.

Apsana Begum Portrait Apsana Begum (Poplar and Limehouse) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

In December 2024, the Prime Minister said in announcing Peter Mandelson as US ambassador that he had “unrivalled experience”. That was despite the gravity of what was known about Peter Mandelson’s record and available publicly. Is it not the case that Peter Mandelson’s political appointment, which was personally decided by the Prime Minister and announced in public before the security vetting was completed, needed to progress and had to happen—however it happened—because of Mandelson’s role in the Prime Minister’s own leadership campaign and because it served the interests of one particular faction in the Labour party?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not accept that that is a reason for withholding from me the information about security clearance.