Leaving the EU: Business of the House Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Angela Eagle

Main Page: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Leaving the EU: Business of the House

Angela Eagle Excerpts
Wednesday 12th June 2019

(5 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Keir Starmer Portrait Keir Starmer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Bill that we passed in March mandated the Prime Minister to seek an extension of article 50. We are in unprecedented times. Parliament has to have the ability to speak on this issue. When we face the suggestion by some leadership contenders that Parliament be prorogued and shut out of the process, we are forced to take action.

Angela Eagle Portrait Ms Angela Eagle (Wallasey) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Is my right hon. and learned Friend as alarmed as I am by the cavalier way in which certain contenders fighting the election for the leadership of the Conservative party seem to think that they can cast Parliament aside to ensure that they have their no-deal Brexit, when this Parliament clearly would not allow a no-deal Brexit to pass? In those circumstances, is not the responsible and right thing to do to give this Parliament the chance to prevent such outrageous shenanigans?

Keir Starmer Portrait Keir Starmer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with every word of that intervention, and I am grateful for it.

The motion makes a simple but important proposition. Let me address why. Primarily, after nine years of austerity, a no-deal Brexit would make the huge social and economic challenges that the country already faces much worse. In the words of manufacturers organisation Make UK, it would be an act of “economic lunacy”. To quote the CBI, it would take a “sledgehammer” to the economy, and Toyota has said that “no deal is terrible” and would “create big additional challenges”. Only yesterday, I was with GMB representatives at the Ford plant in Bridgend. They were very clear about the appalling impact of no deal on jobs.