To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Military Bases: Security
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Asked by: Andrew Rosindell (Reform UK - Romford)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, outside a national-security vetting process and before any application to visit a Defence establishment has been made, whether biographical characteristics relating to nationality or origin, including country or place of birth and citizenship history, may be treated as a sole, material or contributory factor in creating a precautionary restriction concerning a civilian.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for the Armed Forces)

Given that one of the hon. Member's constituents currently has ongoing legal proceedings against the Department regarding these matters, it would be inappropriate to provide a response to these questions at this time.


Written Question
Military Bases: Security
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Asked by: Andrew Rosindell (Reform UK - Romford)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether a direction to create a named system notification intended to cause access to be refused or security personnel to be contacted is treated by his Department as (a) a decision, (b) the implementation of a prior decision, or (c) neither; and what contemporaneous record is required of the directing authority, date, reasons, information relied upon, duration and review date.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for the Armed Forces)

Given that one of the hon. Member's constituents currently has ongoing legal proceedings against the Department regarding these matters, it would be inappropriate to provide a response to these questions at this time.


Written Question
Military Bases: Security
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Asked by: Andrew Rosindell (Reform UK - Romford)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether information arising from an investigation concerning Service personnel may constitute the sole or a material basis for a named adverse access-control entry concerning an associated civilian who is not the subject of that investigation; whether a separate recorded assessment of the civilian is required; and how records must distinguish the subject of an investigation from an associated person.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for the Armed Forces)

Given that one of the hon. Member's constituents currently has ongoing legal proceedings against the Department regarding these matters, it would be inappropriate to provide a response to these questions at this time.


Written Question
Military Bases: Security
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Asked by: Andrew Rosindell (Reform UK - Romford)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department permits a named precautionary restriction or notification concerning a civilian to be created before that person has made any request to visit the relevant establishment; whether an individual assessment must precede (a) creation of the entry and (b) its first operational use; and what maximum review interval applies.

Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for the Armed Forces)

Given that one of the hon. Member's constituents currently has ongoing legal proceedings against the Department regarding these matters, it would be inappropriate to provide a response to these questions at this time.


Division Vote (Commons)
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Rosindell (RUK) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Rosindell (RUK) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Rosindell (RUK) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Rosindell (RUK) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Rosindell (RUK) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 20 Oct 2026
House of Lords Reform

"In a moment. We need also those who represent continuity. Sir John, you will know better than most that continuity is the foundation of the success of this nation. To ignore what has gone on in the past and to lose all that continuous wisdom from the ages is pure …..."
Andrew Rosindell - View Speech

View all Andrew Rosindell (RUK - Romford) contributions to the debate on: House of Lords Reform