Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 3) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 3)

Andrew Percy Excerpts
Tuesday 6th September 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Liz Kendall Portrait Liz Kendall
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Prime Minister claims that the whole profession is now on board for the Bill, and that simply is not the case. Government Members, particularly those on the Liberal Democrat Benches, should remember that the Government have no mandate from either the election or the coalition agreement for fundamental aspects of the Bill. In fact, the coalition agreement promises to do precisely the opposite—to stop top-down reorganisations of the NHS.

The Government want to railroad the Health and Social Care Bill through the House in the face of widespread opposition and huge controversy, and with no mandate for their plans.

Andrew Percy Portrait Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Liz Kendall Portrait Liz Kendall
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will not, because we need to get on to the substance of the debate. The less time that the Government give MPs to scrutinise the Bill, the more people will think that they have something to hide; the more they hide, the longer it will take to get the Bill through the other place.

Unless hon. Members vote against the programme motion, it will be left to Members in the other place to provide the parliamentary scrutiny that the Bill needs and to get answers to the serious questions that remain. I believe that Members of this House should scrutinise legislation and get the answers to questions that our constituents need and deserve. The Government are refusing to give us the time to do our job. I urge Members to vote against the programme motion.