Higher Education Funding Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Higher Education Funding

Andrew Percy Excerpts
Wednesday 3rd November 2010

(14 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Willetts Portrait Mr Willetts
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are in a system where there will be a continuing and very important role for the Government, through providing financial support and through the new regulatory regime that emerges as we think through the proposals from Lord Browne, and where there is a very clear cap—a threshold of £6,000, and in exceptional circumstances, up to £9,000. That is the right way of combining freedom of choice for students and the legitimate role of public policy.

Andrew Percy Portrait Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I have never liked tuition fees; I did not like them when the Labour party introduced them. My concern is for people going into our public services who will most likely be just above the £21,000 threshold but will then be faced with having to pay down tens of thousands of pounds-worth of debt. What can we do to encourage the very best graduates to continue to go into our public services rather than to take the possible route of going for a dash for cash as they attempt to pay off these huge fees?

Lord Willetts Portrait Mr Willetts
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope that the careers advice and guidance function will be very important in this respect, because those are indeed very satisfying careers to which many young people aspire. I hope that my hon. Friend agrees that, with the new threshold of £21,000, people in the circumstances he describes will face lower monthly repayments than they do under the current system.