All 2 Debates between Anas Sarwar and John Bercow

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Anas Sarwar and John Bercow
Tuesday 3rd December 2013

(10 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Last but not least, Anas Sarwar.

Anas Sarwar Portrait Anas Sarwar (Glasgow Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

May I repeat the call from my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Meg Munn) for the Foreign Secretary to keep the spotlight trained on Syria? People believe that the war is over because Assad has agreed to downgrade his weapons programme, but the conflict and destruction are continuing and people are continuing to die. Can we demonstrate not only that the UK believes in minimising the use of weapons but that we are on the side of the ordinary people who are suffering in that crisis?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Anas Sarwar and John Bercow
Wednesday 2nd March 2011

(13 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Maude of Horsham Portrait The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General (Mr Francis Maude)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The informal ministerial group on the big society and decentralisation supports progress across government on cross-cutting issues, such as the role of the voluntary community and social enterprise sector in public service delivery, the progress made in vanguard areas and the compact between the voluntary sector and the state.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. The House must come to order. This is very unfair on the Minister. He is offering the House an informative answer and it must be heard.

Anas Sarwar Portrait Anas Sarwar
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Mr Speaker. I also thank the Minister for his answer. Given that opinion polls show that the majority of the British people have not even heard of the big society and that the majority of those who have think it is just a cover-up for the cuts, does the Minister believe that the work of the ministerial group has been a resounding success? Does he not believe that Ministers’ time would be better spent doing credible work in their own Departments?