Public Spending Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Alex Cunningham

Main Page: Alex Cunningham (Labour - Stockton North)

Public Spending

Alex Cunningham Excerpts
Thursday 17th June 2010

(14 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It was the fact that there is no substantive evidence that it has had any effect on doing the job that it was supposed to do or set out to do—to encourage local authorities to work with business.

Alex Cunningham Portrait Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

We have already heard from the new Prime Minister that the north-east of England can expect to suffer hardest from the cuts, so I want to know precisely why the North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust hospital, which is in my constituency, is not going ahead, particularly as we have seen tremendous progress in reducing health inequalities in my area, and that hospital was going to complete the job.

Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In the context of tighter budgets, it is essential that all major hospital buildings must be affordable and provide value for money. On that basis, the Government decided not to proceed with that scheme. It was assessed against a number of other major build projects that were at the same stage of development; those schemes are more urgent. The hon. Gentleman will be aware that the previous Government set out plans to halve capital spending over the next few years. We have to make judgments about capital spending in the context of budgets that are a great deal tighter. I appreciate that that is disappointing, and I do not wish in any way to belittle the point that the hon. Gentleman is making quite fairly on behalf of his constituents, but in judging these things we have to apply the value-for-money criteria as we have.