Debates between Pete Wishart and John Glen during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Devolution and the Union

Debate between Pete Wishart and John Glen
Thursday 20th November 2014

(9 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Glen Portrait John Glen
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I will make some more progress. All sides of the debate acknowledge that there are disparities in per capita spending across the UK regions.

Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart
- Hansard - -

For the sake of clarity, as lots of people in Scotland are watching the debate, are Conservative Back Benchers saying that this Parliament subsidises Scotland through the Barnett formula? Are we subsidy junkies according to the Tories?

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Gentleman can contain his anger and listen to what I have to say, he will notice that I have not mentioned the word subsidies. It is he who keeps mentioning subsidy, and it is not in my speech—[Hon. Members: “The hon. Member for Esher and Walton (Mr Raab) did!”] But I have not and I will not.

To have an informed debate about funding reform, we need to think carefully about why the disparities exist. Some exist for reasonable historical reasons. However, differences in health spending, for example, due to different demographics and sparsity issues need to be fully examined and we must have a national debate on them. It is right to say that the case needs to be made for each significant disparity. The whole referendum debate has provoked a discussion in this country and we need to address it.