Debates between Nigel Huddleston and Ranil Jayawardena during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 24th Nov 2015

Mobile Telecommunications Market: Contracts

Debate between Nigel Huddleston and Ranil Jayawardena
Tuesday 24th November 2015

(9 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Nigel Huddleston Portrait Nigel Huddleston
- Hansard - -

Indeed. The hon. Gentleman makes a very important point. The debate is focused on the consumer, but the same principles absolutely apply to business: the same discussions and concerns about the customer service of some operators apply equally to business.

When I received my electricity bill the other day, I was very pleased to see a note at the bottom of the bill that said:

“Good news—you’re already on our cheapest overall tariff. We’ll let you know once a year if this changes.”

Would it not be great if there was something similar in the mobile space? Instead, we are paying £5.4 billion more than we have to. Even if that figure is exaggerated and even if it is not correct or just a fraction of that, we are still talking about a significant sum. There are three key reasons why we are significantly overpaying for our mobile services. First, some consumers are paying for services they never use, with 58% generally going under their minutes allocated and 63% under on their text limit.

Ranil Jayawardena Portrait Mr Ranil Jayawardena (North East Hampshire) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate. On consumers paying for services they do not use, does he agree that it is even worse if consumers are paying for a service they cannot use? They enter into a contract in good faith, but are then trapped into a service that does not provide mobile signal at home, on the commute into work, or at work.

Nigel Huddleston Portrait Nigel Huddleston
- Hansard - -

I completely agree. I am focusing on the contract side of things today, but it is absolutely the case that when consumers consider moving operators they look at maps of coverage and whether they can get a 3G or 4G service. That is one of the points to consider. Often they are then persuaded that an alternative operator will fulfil their needs, only to find out when they open the phone at home that that is not the case. There are no repercussions to that and no compensation. That is a major concern that needs to be addressed.