Debates between Matthew Pennycook and Joan Ryan during the 2017-2019 Parliament

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Matthew Pennycook and Joan Ryan
Tuesday 12th June 2018

(6 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Matthew Pennycook Portrait Matthew Pennycook
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is dealing in hypotheticals. Under that scenario, it might be the case that an hon. Member tries to bring forward a resolution, and that the Government provide time, but does he believe, realistically, that such a resolution could pass and would command a majority in this House? It would not.

This is not about frustrating Brexit. Ministers know full well that there is no majority for that in this place, and it is disingenuous, as I said, to argue as much. Lords amendment 19 is about trusting this sovereign House of Commons to do what is right for the country.

Joan Ryan Portrait Joan Ryan (Enfield North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is Government’s job to bring forward policy and Parliament’s job—the Commons, in particular—to legislate? It seems to me that far from taking back control or establishing sovereignty, the Government appear to want to deny Parliament its fundamental role as legislator.

Matthew Pennycook Portrait Matthew Pennycook
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend makes a good point.

Lords amendment 19 is about trusting this sovereign House of Commons to do what is right for the country should it come to pass that the Government bring back a deal that does not secure approval in this House.