Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Collins of Highbury on 26 February (HL Deb col 736), when they expect to conclude the consultation with Scottish and Welsh Ministers about the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations.
Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
The Minister is following the process in the Equality Act 2006 and is consulting the Devolved Governments at the relevant stages, as required under section 14(9). Consultation with Welsh and Scottish Ministers is required if, or in so far as, the Code relates to a duty imposed by or under the Public Sector Equality Duty. As part of the consultation, the draft Code has been shared with the Devolved Administrations. It is important that the correct process for laying the Code is followed. We will not be giving a running commentary whilst this takes place.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question
To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to answer Written Question HL14227, tabled on 3 February and due for answer on 17 February; and for what reason they have not yet answered the question.
Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
I refer the Noble Lord to my answer on 5 March 2026 (PQ HL14227):
Question: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Collins of Highbury on 2 February (HL Deb col 1299), what is the evidential basis that all public services they deliver are in full compliance with the law, as set out in the ruling of the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.
Answer:
As clarified by Lord Collins during the debate on 2 February, the Government is absolutely committed to fully implementing the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] Supreme Court ruling.
Where necessary, government departments are carefully reviewing the ruling’s potential implications in full to ensure that their policies and guidance are legally compliant. It is important that departments take the time to get this right and seek specialist legal advice where necessary.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission - as the independent regulator - has submitted a draft Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations to Ministers, and we are working as quickly as we can to review it with the care it deserves. This will provide further guidance to duty bearers on how they should comply with the Equality Act 2010 following the ruling.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Collins of Highbury on 2 February (HL Deb col 1299), what is the evidential basis that all public services they deliver are in full compliance with the law, as set out in the ruling of the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.
Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
As clarified by Lord Collins during the debate on 2 February, the Government is absolutely committed to fully implementing the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] Supreme Court ruling.
Where necessary, government departments are carefully reviewing the ruling’s potential implications in full to ensure that their policies and guidance are legally compliant. It is important that departments take the time to get this right and seek specialist legal advice where necessary.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission - as the independent regulator - has submitted a draft Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations to Ministers, and we are working as quickly as we can to review it with the care it deserves. This will provide further guidance to duty bearers on how they should comply with the Equality Act 2010 following the ruling.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question
To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker for what reason access by Parliamentary pass holders to College Green was restricted for a period between 1100-1200 on Monday 19 January, and which Parliamentary official or office holder authorised this restriction.
Answered by Lord Gardiner of Kimble
The safety and security of all those who work on and visit the Parliamentary Estate is a top priority, with access controls in place to maintain this safety. Black Rod’s Office in the House of Lords work with The Serjeant at Arms’ Office and the Parliamentary Security Department to ensure that access, including the passage at College Green, is maintained wherever possible to allow for Parliamentary pass holders to have the access they need within the Estate and between parts of the Estate so that they can carry out their duties.
Access to College Green is managed by the House of Commons through the office of the Serjeant at Arms, in consultation with the Parliamentary Security Department. On the date in question, access was briefly impeded by a personal security operative working for an MP. The Office of the Serjeant at Arms has since reminded the MP of the established protocols to ensure that access is not impeded, restricted, or interrupted by security operatives or broadcast teams.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government to what extent Exercise Pegasus 2025 included members of both Houses of Parliament for oversight and scrutiny.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
Exercise PEGASUS, the largest simulation of a pandemic in United Kingdom history, aimed to test our ability to respond to a pandemic, involving all regions and nations of the UK and thousands of participants, including Government ministers.
The live-simulation elements of the exercise took place on three non-sequential days with the exercise testing actions and decision making at specific points in time during a pandemic.
We have continued to engage both Houses of Parliament on the progress of the exercise, including by two Written Ministerial Statements. This engagement will continue as we progress phase four of the exercise, and the final post-exercise report and findings.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Merron on 16 December (HL Deb Col 661), (1) how many, and (2) what proportion of, NHS staff have taken up the offer of a flu vaccination this year; and how does that compare to each of the previous five years for (a) total NHS staff and (b) NHS staff by job category.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
For England, the UK Health Security Agency publishes monthly provisional vaccine uptake data for frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) from November to March. The most recent monthly data was published on 18 December 2025 and includes all vaccinations given between 1 September to 30 November 2025. For the 2025 to 2026, and 2024 to 2025 seasons HCWs have been eligible from 1 and 3 October respectively, rather than 1 September as in previous seasons. Data is therefore not comparable with seasons prior to 2024 to 2025.
Vaccine uptake data, both percentages and numbers vaccinated, is given at a national, regional, and trust level, with data by staff groups, as percentages, also given. For previous seasons the available data by staff group varies and some previous seasons have numbers vaccinated available. The table attached shows the seasonal influenza vaccine uptake amongst frontline HCWs in National Health Service trusts in England, at a national and staff group level, for vaccinations given between 1 September, where applicable, and 30 November, for the 2020 to 2026 seasons. The numbers vaccinated are based on response rates from NHS trusts and are not extrapolated to represent 100% of the data.
Final end of season vaccine uptake data is published in the annual reports in late spring and include data on staff groups. Annual reports include national level comparative data from 19 previous seasons.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government how much revenue was received as a result of the work of overseas visitor managers in the NHS (1) in total, and (2) in each NHS Trust, in each of the last five years.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Department does not hold the data requested on the number of overseas visitor managers that are employed by the National Health Service.
NHS England publishes Hospital and Community Health Services workforce statistics for England. The data is drawn from the Electronic Staff Record, the Human Resources system for the NHS. The level of detail available in the dataset is insufficient to identify staff who are employed in roles described as ‘Overseas Visitor Managers’ or similar.
The Department and NHS England publish annual data on the income identified and recovered from chargeable overseas visitors in England in the Department’s Annual Report and Accounts and in NHS England’s consolidated NHS provider accounts.
The following table shows aggregate income identified and cash payments received between 2020 and 2025:
Year | Aggregate income identified | Cash payments received in-year |
2020/21 | £61,000,000 | £21,000,000 |
2021/22 | £67,000,000 | £25,000,000 |
2022/23 | £100,000,000 | £32,000,000 |
2023/24 | £123,000,000 | £42,000,000 |
2024/25 | £142,000,000 | £43,000,000 |
Source: The Department of Health and Social Care Annual Report and Accounts and Consolidated NHS provider accounts.
Neither the Department nor NHS England hold a breakdown of this information by NHS trust.
NHS charges can be recovered up to six years from the date of invoice, and therefore the amount recovered in a year does not necessarily mean it was identified in the same financial year.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government how many Overseas Visitor Managers are employed by the NHS (1) in total, and (2) in each NHS Trust.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Department does not hold the data requested on the number of overseas visitor managers that are employed by the National Health Service.
NHS England publishes Hospital and Community Health Services workforce statistics for England. The data is drawn from the Electronic Staff Record, the Human Resources system for the NHS. The level of detail available in the dataset is insufficient to identify staff who are employed in roles described as ‘Overseas Visitor Managers’ or similar.
The Department and NHS England publish annual data on the income identified and recovered from chargeable overseas visitors in England in the Department’s Annual Report and Accounts and in NHS England’s consolidated NHS provider accounts.
The following table shows aggregate income identified and cash payments received between 2020 and 2025:
Year | Aggregate income identified | Cash payments received in-year |
2020/21 | £61,000,000 | £21,000,000 |
2021/22 | £67,000,000 | £25,000,000 |
2022/23 | £100,000,000 | £32,000,000 |
2023/24 | £123,000,000 | £42,000,000 |
2024/25 | £142,000,000 | £43,000,000 |
Source: The Department of Health and Social Care Annual Report and Accounts and Consolidated NHS provider accounts.
Neither the Department nor NHS England hold a breakdown of this information by NHS trust.
NHS charges can be recovered up to six years from the date of invoice, and therefore the amount recovered in a year does not necessarily mean it was identified in the same financial year.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Merron on 16 December (HL Deb Col 661), what research has been carried out by, or on behalf of, the NHS to identify the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among NHS staff.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Department invests over £1.6 billion each year on research through its research delivery arm, the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). It is funding research into the causes of vaccine hesitancy and ways to improve vaccine uptake in all adults and children, and to reduce inequalities in coverage.
The NIHR has funded a specific study aimed at improving the uptake rate of vaccination in the National Health Service for seasonal influenza. The results are published in Improving uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination by healthcare workers: Implementation differences between higher and lower uptake NHS trusts in England, from Infection, Disease and Health, volume 24, issue 1, published February 2019.
The NIHR has also funded research addressing factors associated with vaccine intention during COVID-19, which included health and social care workers. These results are published in Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, in volume 17 in 2021, and volume 18 in 2022.
Other ongoing research to address the decline in immunisation rates is carried out by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation and the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Evaluation and Behavioural Science. Both have received funding of £5.5 million over five years.
The NIHR continues to welcome funding applications for research into any aspect of human health, including vaccine hesitancy among National Health Service staff.
Asked by: Lord Harper (Conservative - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the expected (1) total and (2) per capita reduction in daily calorie intake for (1) adults and (2) children in England as a result of the extension of the soft drinks industry levy announced on 25 November.
Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The changes to the Soft Drinks Industry Levy announced in the 2025 Autumn Budget are:
These changes will apply from 1 January 2028. They are designed to encourage producers to reformulate their products to reduce sugar levels and avoid paying the levy, thus reducing the calories consumed from the drinks in scope.
The Department carried out a health benefit assessment to estimate the calorie reduction from these changes through reformulation and substitution to alternative drinks. Together, these changes reduce sugar and calorie intake from drinks across all age groups.
The analysis used nutrition data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, sales data from Worldpanel by Numerator, formerly Kantar WorldPanel, and a series of assumptions to estimate the sugar and calories removed from diets due to the changes. The approach, data sources, and assumptions are set out in detail in the published assessment.
This analysis estimates per person per day calorie reductions of 0.3 kcal in five to 10 year olds, 0.4 kcal in 11 to 18 year olds, 0.3 kcal in 19 to 64 year olds, and 0.2 kcal in those aged 65 years old and over. This is equivalent to approximately four million kcal per day in children and 13 million kcal per day in adults.