All 1 Debates between Lord Williams of Elvel and Lord Strathclyde

Companion to the Standing Orders

Debate between Lord Williams of Elvel and Lord Strathclyde
Tuesday 25th October 2011

(12 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Williams of Elvel Portrait Lord Williams of Elvel
- Hansard - -



To ask the Leader of the House who is responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the Companion to the Standing Orders are respected.

Lord Strathclyde Portrait The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Lord Strathclyde)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, as Leader of the House I have a particular responsibility to advise the House on procedure and order. However the Companion makes clear that because the House is self-regulating, the preservation of order and the maintenance of the rules of debate are the responsibility of the House itself, of all the Members who are present. It is open to any Member to draw the House’s attention to breaches of order at any time.

Lord Williams of Elvel Portrait Lord Williams of Elvel
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord the Leader of the House for that response. I am sure that he is absolutely right, but is he aware that during the passage of the Armed Forces Bill, at Report, the usual channels managed to stitch up a deal apparently in order to avoid Divisions at Report of that Bill, and postpone them to Third Reading? The deal transgressed not only the letter but the spirit of the Companion. Will he give us an assurance that that sort of deal will never happen again?

Lord Strathclyde Portrait Lord Strathclyde
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am well aware of the situation that arose on Report of the Armed Forces Bill. The reason why an agreement took place was so as to allow the Health and Social Care Bill Second Reading to be postponed from Tuesday 4 October to Tuesday 11 October. I think the whole House would have approved of that decision. These decisions were made by the usual channels, as I made clear, so as to help the House as a whole. I do not think there was any detriment in taking that decision.