Capenhurst Facility: High-assay Low-enriched Uranium Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Wigley
Main Page: Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Wigley's debates with the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
(1 day, 17 hours ago)
Lords Chamber
Baroness Curran (Lab)
I recognise the importance of that question, and the strength that lies behind it. We very much support that urgency and the need to make sure that it is all about delivery, and recognise the connection to the small modular programme, which is something that we will emphasise. In terms of this programme, we have broken ground, completed design milestones, and are on track for 2031. Funding is being drawn down appropriately on achieving project milestones. I asked specifically how that is monitored and how we push ahead with that programme. There is confidence, and we are assured of that; there is vitality in this programme. We understand its relevance, and that we must provide this as an alternative to Russian supply. It is vital for our security, and I commit to my noble friend that I will attempt to match his enthusiasm and drive to make sure that this happens.
Lord Wigley (PC)
My Lords, will the Minister give an assurance that there are no issues arising in Capenhurst that will be allowed to delay the new SMR programme for the replacement of the Wylfa power station in Anglesey?
Baroness Curran (Lab)
I have been assured that it will not create any delays. I will make sure that I answer the specifics of that and perhaps write to the noble Lord to make sure that I give him that assurance. As I stand here, my understanding is that I can categorically give that assurance.