Debates between Lord Whitty and Baroness Rawlings during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Public Bodies Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Whitty and Baroness Rawlings
Wednesday 23rd March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Whitty Portrait Lord Whitty
- Hansard - -

My Lords, my name is also on this amendment. Indeed, it was my amendment in Committee to which the noble Baroness responded. The Government, understandably, are a little diffident towards the Opposition tonight. The fact is that there has been, if not quite a U-turn, definitely a bit of a C-turn on this—quite rightly, too. Under the Bill as printed, the Government were going to abolish this body. They were not going to substitute statutorily backed self-regulation. What existed in the SIA was going disappear. The regulation of the industry and the personnel within it, and the standards and the great improvement in those standards that we have seen since the SIA was set up, could have been seriously endangered.

Just before the previous vote, the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, met a certain degree of scepticism from these Benches when he said that the Government were a listening Government. At least on this amendment the Government have listened to some degree.

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, on Report there is time for a noble Lord to ask just one question after the Minister has spoken.

Lord Whitty Portrait Lord Whitty
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the Minister was not replying to the debate. The amendment was moved by my noble friend Lord Kennedy. I put my name to it, as did the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, so I think I am in order.