Artificial Intelligence: Regulation

Lord Watts Excerpts

Monday 10th February 2025 Lords Chamber

[Lord Vallance of Balham (Lab)]

As I think I have made clear on several occasions at this Dispatch Box, we do not support that position. We believe that there needs to be control for creators; we need much better transparency in the system, and there needs to be access to use those images for AI. Those three things go hand in hand.

[Lord Watts (Lab)]

My Lords, the creative industries are the second-most important industry in the UK. Will the Minister guarantee that under the legislation creators’ work will be protected and they will be properly rewarded for the work that they do?

[Lord Vallance of Balham (Lab)]

We absolutely agree that creators need to be appropriately recognised and rewarded. That is why the system being developed will give greater transparency on what is being used for what purposes and will allow access while also protecting the rights of creators. It is important to have a technological solution to allow this and to prevent access where creators did not want it to occur.

Research, Development and Innovation Organisational Landscape Report

Lord Watts Excerpts

Monday 20th November 2023 Lords Chamber

[Viscount Camrose (Con)]

Yes, indeed: these are very important principles to allow research institutions, whether publicly or privately funded, autonomy in the research they undertake. As well as the Nurse review, the Tickell review into bureaucracy in the R&D landscape addresses these things and we will also shortly be publishing our response to the latter review.

[Lord Watts (Lab)]

My Lords, is there evidence that the successive cuts in business taxes have led to increases in investment and research in the UK?

[Viscount Camrose (Con)]

If there any such evidence, I am afraid I am not familiar with it.

Animal Torture: Online Videos

Lord Watts Excerpts

Tuesday 27th June 2023 Lords Chamber

[Viscount Camrose (Con)]

I recognise the argument that increased cruelty to animals promotes further bad behaviour, including violence between humans, but I stress the point that the purpose of the Online Safety Bill is to bring into law a range of limitations on what can be published and what can be seen online by human beings. There are laws that effectively criminalise cruel behaviour to animals and the action of publishing evidence of cruelty to animals online; those laws just happen not to be the Online Safety Bill.

[Lord Watts (Lab)]

My Lords, the Minister says that the Government are against cruelty to animals, yet we have just heard that the present legislation does not stop it. Is it not the case that we need regulation that will prosecute and convict people involved in these practices? Can he tell us how many people have been prosecuted so far this year for animal cruelty?

[Viscount Camrose (Con)]

I have the numbers prosecuted for animal cruelty in my notes somewhere; I will happily write to the noble Lord.