All 1 Debates between Lord Stoddart of Swindon and Lord Woolmer of Leeds

Energy: Annual Statement

Debate between Lord Stoddart of Swindon and Lord Woolmer of Leeds
Tuesday 27th July 2010

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Woolmer of Leeds Portrait Lord Woolmer of Leeds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister and congratulate him on the Statement made on biomass grandfathering rights. I am delighted—

Lord Woolmer of Leeds Portrait Lord Woolmer of Leeds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I congratulate the Minister on the Statement on grandfathering rights for dedicated biomass plant. It is very welcome and an important step forward.

Does the noble Lord agree that the support given for offshore wind through the renewable obligation requirements on energy suppliers is an important element in securing investment in offshore wind; that this is reflected in electricity prices and could reasonably be said to avoid a public subsidy? Does he agree that electricity prices reflect support through renewable obligations rather than public subsidy? If so, do he and his coalition partners in the Liberal Democrat Party agree that this is a potential way forward for supporting nuclear power generation?

Lord Marland Portrait Lord Marland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Woolmer, for his comments. His knowledge of biomass is well known and I defer to no man with greater knowledge. I am glad that he welcomes the Statement on that subject because, as he well knows, it is important that we have ROCs to incentivise and encourage the 400 megawatts of development that we think we can achieve between now and 2013. That is an important and significant step forward. As I indicated earlier, we are committed to nuclear. We shall help nuclear in terms of planning and so on but it will be without subsidy—and an ROC could be considered a subsidy.