To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171
Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 180
Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 169
Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 172
Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 171
Division Vote (Lords)
4 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Smith of Finsbury (None) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 167
Written Question
Aerials: Highlands of Scotland
Wednesday 31st January 2024

Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Viscount Camrose of 19 December 2023 (HL1000, HL1001), whether they can explain why geographical coverage was chosen as the goal for the Shared Rural Network of telephone masts, instead of population coverage.

Answered by Viscount Camrose - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The decision to choose geographic coverage as the preferred target for the Shared Rural Network (SRN) programme reflects the longstanding commitment from the government to improve geographic mobile coverage. This includes a commitment to extend mobile coverage to 95% of the UK landmass in the 2017 manifesto.

Specifying a geographic target for the SRN recognises the need for people to be connected whilst they are on the move, and reflects our desire to end the digital divide between urban and rural areas. It ensures that the programme remains focused on delivering benefits to the most rural parts of the country.

There are a number of expected benefits of improving mobile coverage in rural areas which have often been left behind. Masts in rural areas will improve the safety of those living, working and visiting the area, enabling 4G to facilitate 999 calls for the first time. Other benefits include economic and productivity growth, as well as wider social benefits including improved consumer choice, tourism benefits and rural/urban equity.