London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill [HL] Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Sewel
Main Page: Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated - Life peer)London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill [HL]
Lord Sewel Excerpts
Tuesday 3rd December 2013
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
(10 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text
Moved by
The Chairman of Committees
That this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments 1 to 52.
1: Page 1, line 10, leave out paragraph (5)
--- Later in debate ---
52: Clause 22, page 17, leave out from the beginning of line 30 to the end of line 7 on page 18 and insert—
“(1) A person shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if he uses charging apparatus in contravention of a sign displayed on the apparatus which indicates that —
(a) the apparatus is not to be used for any purpose other than charging a vehicle; and
(b) it is an offence to so use the apparatus.
(2) A person is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if—
(a) he had the permission of the person who operated the charging apparatus at the time to use the charging apparatus for the purpose in question; or
(b) he had reasonable cause to believe he had such permission; or
(b) at the time there was on the charging apparatus an indication given by the person who operated the charging apparatus that it could be used for the purpose for which it was used.”
“(1) A person shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if he uses charging apparatus in contravention of a sign displayed on the apparatus which indicates that —
(a) the apparatus is not to be used for any purpose other than charging a vehicle; and
(b) it is an offence to so use the apparatus.
(2) A person is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if—
(a) he had the permission of the person who operated the charging apparatus at the time to use the charging apparatus for the purpose in question; or
(b) he had reasonable cause to believe he had such permission; or
(b) at the time there was on the charging apparatus an indication given by the person who operated the charging apparatus that it could be used for the purpose for which it was used.”
The Chairman of Committees (Lord Sewel)
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments 1 to 52 en bloc. I do not intend to move these amendments individually as they all refer to minor matters. I hope that the House will agree to the amendments made in another place.
Motion agreed.