Debates between Lord Pickles and John Pugh during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Local Government Finance

Debate between Lord Pickles and John Pugh
Wednesday 19th December 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

I commend the hon. Gentleman for thoroughly reading that document, although I trust he did not start from the back and work his way forward. The hon. Gentleman represents Durham—[Interruption.] Well, I would be superhuman if I remembered every single figure in my head. Per household, his council receives £2,228, and the reduction in its spending power is less than the national average. The hon. Gentleman should be thanking me rather than talking about sock puppets.

John Pugh Portrait John Pugh (Southport) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In his statement, the Secretary of State said that next year the new homes bonus will be worth more than £650 million, and even more in 2014-15. He later said, “We’ve reduced the amounts that we are setting aside for new homes bonus.” Will he clarify whether there will be a cut in the new homes bonus?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

Very easily. We had discussions with local authorities, and we were going to hold back by way of the top slice a particular sum in order to pay for the new homes bonus. Local authorities put to us a number of reasonable points about how the new homes bonus and—for want of a better word—the cash flow will be paid. We thought they made a reasonable point and decided that we were not taking much of a risk by keeping close to what local authorities were saying.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Pickles and John Pugh
Monday 12th March 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Pugh Portrait John Pugh (Southport) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

Lord Pickles Portrait The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Mr Eric Pickles)
- Hansard - -

Last week we announced that the abolition of the Audit Commission will save councils £250 million over the next five years in lower audit fees, so cutting quangos does save money; we have finally abolished Labour’s ports tax, which threatened to scupper England’s export trade, so cutting taxes saves jobs; and, finally, we have welcomed more than 3,500 applications so far for diamond jubilee street parties, promoting our guide to organising a street party, so it shows that cutting red tape allows more bunting to be put up.

John Pugh Portrait John Pugh
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for that welcome news, but as part of his duties as Secretary of State will he defend the right of Christian local authority workers discreetly to wear crosses or crucifixes at work, just as he would I hope defend the right of Sikhs to wear the turban, given a pending European judgment?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

It is certainly my view that, provided any object does not get in the way of someone doing their job, a discreet display of their religion is something that we should welcome.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Pickles and John Pugh
Monday 31st October 2011

(13 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

I know the right hon. Gentleman is new to the job, but he is very distinguished and should at least have done his homework. He knows perfectly well that that is certainly not the case. We are having very constructive discussions with Sport England about planning policy, and those protections will be there.

John Pugh Portrait John Pugh (Southport) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T2. What are the Government doing about empty homes and, in particular, homes above shops as a way of easing pressure on the green belt?

Local Government Finance

Debate between Lord Pickles and John Pugh
Monday 13th December 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

I am happy to do that. Let us deal first with social services authorities. In 2011-12, the floor will be 11.3% for the most dependent authorities, then 12.3%, 13.3% and 14.3% for the least dependent. In the case of shire districts, the floor will be 13.8% for the most dependent, then 14.8%, 15.8% and 16.8%, so there is a good 3% difference between the various bands. Of course, for an authority such as Knowsley there will be a transitional grant on top of that to get the levels down to 8.9%.

John Pugh Portrait Dr John Pugh (Southport) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Secretary of State clarify whether the new formula more adequately addresses the needs of authorities such as Sefton that have a disproportionate number of elderly residents?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - -

Authorities with elderly residents, of course, will be some of the relatively big gainers because of the provision of adult social care. We want to put extra money into authorities with social services departments, and thanks to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health, we are looking at putting in serious money to deal with adult social care. I can recall standing at the Opposition Dispatch Box and asking for precisely the action that we have delivered today.