To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 06 Jan 2026
Sentencing Bill

"Can the noble and learned Lord clarify, at an appropriate point, subsection (2) of the proposed new clause in Amendment 68? It says:

“Sentencing remarks may be published only”


in certain circumstances. My first question is: is that meant to restrict the rights of the victim under subsection (1) …..."

Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Sentencing Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 06 Jan 2026
Venezuela

"My Lords, I remind the noble Baroness that when the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hermer, was sworn in as the Attorney-General on 15 July 2024, he gave a speech in which he said that

“from the Prime Minister down, the new government is comprised of individuals who have the …..."

Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Venezuela

Division Vote (Lords)
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pannick (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench No votes vs 12 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pannick (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 14 Crossbench No votes vs 4 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pannick (XB) voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 13 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
Division Vote (Lords)
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pannick (XB) voted No and in line with the House
One of 29 Crossbench No votes vs 5 Crossbench Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 05 Jan 2026
Government Communications: X

"My Lords, the Minister’s argument in relation to X appears to be that it may be obnoxious, but other people use it so the Government must too. Is it not sometimes appropriate for the Government to take a position, adopt a principle and do what they think is right?..."
Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Government Communications: X

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 17 Dec 2025
Crime and Policing Bill

"I entirely accept that there is mischief here. My comments were addressed at the specifics of the amendment—but I accept that there is a problem that needs to be addressed...."
Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Crime and Policing Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 17 Dec 2025
Crime and Policing Bill

"The Minister is making a very strong case as to the principle behind these clauses, as did the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey. But will he address the specific concern of the Constitution Committee that the language used in these provisions—the concepts of “insulting” and “distress”—is too broad?

As he knows, …..."

Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Crime and Policing Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 17 Dec 2025
Crime and Policing Bill

"I do not want to prolong this, but the purpose of this amendment is not to regulate the speed of the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, on his field. The concern is e-bike riders on pavements, and I suggest that the answer is to ensure that people cannot ride more than …..."
Lord Pannick - View Speech

View all Lord Pannick (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Crime and Policing Bill