Employment Rights Bill

Debate between Lord Leigh of Hurley and Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Lord Leigh of Hurley Portrait Lord Leigh of Hurley (Con)
- Hansard - -

Can the Minister clarify—to be absolutely crystal clear—that, by removing Section 32ZB, union members will have absolutely no idea where campaign money is being spent?

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch Portrait Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thought I answered that: the information on the expenditure of the political fund will still have to be given to the certification officer.

Lord Leigh of Hurley Portrait Lord Leigh of Hurley (Con)
- Hansard - -

With great respect, I asked whether union members would have clarity as to where their money was being spent.

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch Portrait Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am absolutely confident that unions’ accounts, which will include the political funds, will be available to all members in the usual way. I am sure that is a requirement.

Baroness Bousted Portrait Baroness Bousted (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can inform the noble Lord that unions have to produce an executive report for the membership every year. That is available to all the membership; it is on the union’s website. In most unions, by the rulebook, the executive report is the first thing debated at conference. All the union’s activities and expenditure are described and explained to the membership in that report, including the amount of the political fund and the expenditure of the political fund. It is the same with the international fund and the campaigning fund. This is a requirement, as part of unions’ democratic processes, to make the executive accountable to the membership, and the information will be contained in the executive report.