All 1 Debates between Lord Lea of Crondall and Baroness D'Souza

Wed 10th Feb 2016

Trade Union Bill

Debate between Lord Lea of Crondall and Baroness D'Souza
Wednesday 10th February 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness D'Souza Portrait The Lord Speaker (Baroness D’Souza)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, if this amendment is agreed to, I cannot call Amendment 24 by reason of pre-emption.

Lord Lea of Crondall Portrait Lord Lea of Crondall (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, perhaps I may add one point to the excellent summary given by my noble friend Lord Collins. I would like to make an analogy with the other big thing that is happening in our lives at the moment—the EU referendum. You have to think about what you want to get out of a negotiation and consider whether it is conducive to getting an acceptable outcome if you spell out every possible thing that you might want. It seems to me that there is a risk in the clause that the Government want to include because the unions would be almost obliged to put everything and the kitchen sink in the list of demands. This could be counterproductive and make it much more difficult for unions and employers to resolve disputes. Why? Because they might find it difficult to convince members that they should accept a settlement that does not deal with all the issues listed in the ballot paper. In some disputes, it will be difficult for the union to predict how employers will respond and how they will wish to negotiate the settlement.

It would be wise, therefore, for the Minister, in her response, perhaps to acknowledge some degree of validity in the idea that it is not always a good thing to put too much information in the question of dispute.