Companies: Remuneration Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Lea of Crondall

Main Page: Lord Lea of Crondall (Non-affiliated - Life peer)

Companies: Remuneration

Lord Lea of Crondall Excerpts
Wednesday 23rd March 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for his question. He raised a number of points, including the national living wage, which is about to come into force. We must also remember that the national minimum wage has had one of the biggest increases in its history. We take into account all the matters that he raised. He referred also to employee engagement and how important that is in the workplace.

Lord Lea of Crondall Portrait Lord Lea of Crondall (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the Minister aware that, at a time of fast economic growth for several decades, the ratio of remuneration from the top to the bottom in companies—as a member of the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth I remember the numbers going back to the start of the 20th century—came down from 100:1, to 90:1, to 80:1, to 70:1, winding up at 15:1 or something like that? Would he not agree with the Labour Party’s manifesto that there should at least be workers’ representatives on boards’ remuneration committees?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

At least the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, has asked me a question that I can answer. The answer is, of course, no. My right honourable friend the Chancellor of Exchequer has been working throughout his period as Chancellor to reduce inequality.