Arrangement of Business
Debate between Lord Kennedy of Southwark and Lord Austin of Dudley
Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms and Chief Whip (Lord Kennedy of Southwark) (Lab Co-op)
My Lords, I advise the House that one of our colleagues has been taken ill. I thank the usual channels and all Members for coming together in order to do the Statement an hour early. Our friend and colleague has now been moved to hospital, so the Lobbies are now open. Before we adjourned, we were about to vote on Amendment 14, so if that amendment is divided on, we can vote on it straight away and carry on with our business for the rest of the evening.
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-Afl)
I am sure the whole House will want to echo the comments just made about our colleague who has been taken ill. However, we have had just 20 minutes’ debate on a significant change that the Government are introducing. It will be introduced with no proper debate. We have had 11 questions—that is all we had time for—and there will be no proper discussion of the proposal to introduce a definition of anti-Muslim hostility. The Government really should allocate proper time to debate the introduction of such significant changes.
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Lab Co-op)
I thank the noble Lord for those comments. Obviously, I am happy to chat to him outside the Chamber, but we have allocated the proper time of 40 minutes—20 for the Front Benches and 20 for the Back Benches—which is quite normal for these Statements.
We should now move on to the next business, but again, on behalf of the whole House, I thank our colleagues, the doorkeepers and all the other staff who assisted our friend and colleague, as well as the ambulance staff who dealt with our friend so professionally.
Visas: Highly Skilled People
Debate between Lord Kennedy of Southwark and Lord Austin of Dudley(3 months, 2 weeks ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-Afl)
With 1 million young people not in education, training or work, and with the number of apprenticeships having collapsed in this country, how can it possibly make sense for us to waive the visa rules to bring in roofers, bricklayers, carpenters and care workers, let alone nurses and other NHS workers? These are all highly skilled roles, but we can train young people up to do them quite quickly. Would it not make much more sense to massively increase the number of apprenticeships available for young people who are in this country already?