All 1 Debates between Lord Hughes of Woodside and Lord Colwyn

Recall of MPs Bill

Debate between Lord Hughes of Woodside and Lord Colwyn
Monday 19th January 2015

(9 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Colwyn Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Colwyn) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If Amendment 40 is agreed to, I will be unable to call Amendments 41 to 43 because of pre-emption.

Lord Hughes of Woodside Portrait Lord Hughes of Woodside
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I have been thinking very carefully about this idea of the wording in the Bill. As the wording is in the Bill, someone who gets the petition has the choice either to sign it or not to take part in the petition process. In other words, it is a one-way process. There is no opportunity for someone who is against the recall of the MP to say, “No”. Why can we not have a straight yes/no question? That is what democracy is about.

The issues surrounding the recall of an MP will generate much excitement—if that is the right word to use—about the behaviour of the MP, sticking strictly to the three triggers, whichever one is to be used. There will be a tremendous bandwagon: there will be no possibility of the MP defending himself or herself. How is that feeling to be translated? The MP who is faced with this petition may well be extremely popular. There is no possibility of that popularity being translated in any shape or form in the petition—and, as we come to in a further amendment, with the proportion of the electorate that is to take part. But it is all one-sided. I cannot see how this can in all senses be fair or sensible. I hope that the Minister will accept the amendment so at least there will be further discussion about how the process might go.