To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 03 Jul 2025
UK–EU Defence and Security Co-operation

"My Lords, will the Minister take the message back to his department that maritime security is under direct challenge now. With the Red Sea virtually closed and the Persian Gulf about to be closed if possible, that is the real challenge to our security and prosperity and where our attention …..."
Lord Howell of Guildford - View Speech

View all Lord Howell of Guildford (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: UK–EU Defence and Security Co-operation

Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 249 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243
Division Vote (Lords)
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 176
Division Vote (Lords)
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 180 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196
Division Vote (Lords)
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 150
Division Vote (Lords)
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 137
Division Vote (Lords)
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205
Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 30 Jun 2025
UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

"I am glad that some noble Lords got the joke.

I will use my four and a half minutes to discuss the security aspects of the whole project, which are by far the most important in the present state of the world. The position of the Chagos Islanders has been …..."

Lord Howell of Guildford - View Speech

View all Lord Howell of Guildford (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 30 Jun 2025
UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

"My Lords, I join with others in the very best wishes to what might be called the Boswell team. The noble and learned Baroness, Lady Prentis, has shown by her speech that she has a thoroughly professional mind and training, which will bring great value to our counsels, and we …..."
Lord Howell of Guildford - View Speech

View all Lord Howell of Guildford (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 26 Jun 2025
National Security Strategy

"Does the noble Baroness agree that the growing Commonwealth network, with its people involvement at all levels, its unifying soft power—and indeed, increasingly, its hard power, as we have recently seen—and its maritime data integration powers, is a key part of our national security, our influence and our adaptation to …..."
Lord Howell of Guildford - View Speech

View all Lord Howell of Guildford (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: National Security Strategy