All 2 Debates between Lord Hill of Oareford and Lord Mawhinney

Schools: Pupil Premium

Debate between Lord Hill of Oareford and Lord Mawhinney
Monday 6th December 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the pupil premium, as the noble Lord knows, is intended for pupils from the age of reception up to year 11. I am aware of the issues around the education maintenance allowance and the point that underlies the noble Lord’s question. The enhanced discretionary fund, which will be targeted on those who most need the help, will, I hope, deal with some of that. For 16 to 18 year-olds, deprivation factors are already in the funding formula which will help to address some of the same issues.

Lord Mawhinney Portrait Lord Mawhinney
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, what do the Government intend to do with those head teachers whose reports to parents indicate that the money was not used for the premium?

Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - -

As usual, my noble friend is a few steps ahead of me. We will need to address how we police that, and to reflect on the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, as well. We are not yet even at the point of announcing the premium so I am afraid that I cannot give my noble friend a completely satisfactory answer about what we will do in a year’s time.

Children: Care

Debate between Lord Hill of Oareford and Lord Mawhinney
Wednesday 24th November 2010

(13 years, 12 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I think that the Act makes clear that the priority in making those decisions is that a child should stay with the family or with a suitable family member. No one wants to get into the situation whereby there is a presumption that a child should be taken from the family into care. Everyone would want the child to remain with the family or a member of the family as long as the child is not at risk.

Lord Mawhinney Portrait Lord Mawhinney
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, my noble friend said that he would reflect on the Question of the noble Baroness, Lady Knight of Collingtree. Will he also reflect on the fact that the experience of Members of Parliament is that a lot of the distress caused in this area is due to lack of adequate and comprehensive communication between the local authority and the parents? Perhaps he might see whether, arising out of his reflection, some guidance would be helpful.

Lord Hill of Oareford Portrait Lord Hill of Oareford
- Hansard - -

I am happy to take those points back and I hope that the Munro review, which is looking into this whole area much more broadly, will also come forward with helpful suggestions for all of us in this difficult area to make sure that we get the balance right.