European Council and Nuclear Security Summit

Debate between Lord Hill of Oareford and Lord Lawson of Blaby

Wednesday 26th March 2014 Lords Chamber

[Lord Hill of Oareford]

The noble Lord makes two very important points. The consequence of Russia’s actions is that, in any international relationship of that sort, why would anyone believe its word, given that in 1994 it freely entered into the negotiations that the noble Lord mentioned, which guaranteed the integrity of Ukraine and the future of its nuclear weapons?

[Lord Lawson of Blaby (Con)]

My Lords, I welcome the Prime Minister’s recognition that it is necessary and desirable to press ahead as fast as possible with the development of the UK’s indigenous shale gas resources, not merely because it will be good for the economy, but on geopolitical grounds because it will lessen the West’s reliance on Russian gas. However, is it not shameful that so far there has been only one exploratory well drilled in this country and that the industry is clear that the reason for the snail’s pace of progress is the mind-boggling bureaucratic complexity of the regulatory system in this country? Is it not time that the Government put their money where their mouth is and sorted this out?

[Lord Hill of Oareford]

I agree with my noble friend’s point on the contribution that shale gas can make to the geopolitical balance of power and to increasing our collective independence, which I think is absolutely right. I also agree with him about the other benefits that it could bring to the economy, and the sooner we can crack on with it, the better.

Schools: Nutrition

Debate between Lord Hill of Oareford and Lord Lawson of Blaby

Wednesday 13th June 2012 Lords Chamber

[Lord Hill of Oareford]

My Lords, I am very grateful for the suggestion. Yes, of course.

[Lord Lawson of Blaby]

My Lords—