Nationalised Passenger Rail Services Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Nationalised Passenger Rail Services

Lord Hamilton of Epsom Excerpts
Monday 2nd February 2026

(1 day, 15 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill Portrait Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think the noble Lord will find that that goes via Thameslink, which will be taken into public ownership in four months. It is one of the operators whose management tries modestly hard, but it has a problem with a number of drivers. In due course, the Government will take steps to fix it.

Lord Hamilton of Epsom Portrait Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, last time the trains were nationalised, they were dirty and late, and the sandwiches were so old that they were curling up at the corners. Why is it going to be different this time?

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill Portrait Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is a sort of music hall view of railway life, is it not? The truth is that the system this Government inherited had got to the end of its life—that is a polite way of putting it. You can prove that it did because the train companies that they took into public ownership stayed in public ownership. They chose to keep LNER, which had three failed operators, in public ownership because, frankly, it ran better. That is what we are trying to achieve. The growth in passenger numbers, which is greater in all the publicly owned train companies over the last year than it has been in privately owned operating companies, is testimony to that.