Debates between Lord Geddes and Lord Nash during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Sex and Relationships Education

Debate between Lord Geddes and Lord Nash
Thursday 24th November 2016

(8 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Nash Portrait Lord Nash
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As the noble Baroness will know, in the past few years we have tried to strengthen the role of school governors to make sure that they have the right skills. It is certainly true to say that many governors coming through now are fully aware of the role that schools should play in providing a much wider education and being aware of the issues facing young people being brought up in modern Britain.

Lord Geddes Portrait Lord Geddes (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is there not a particular onus on parents in the context of this Question?

Lord Nash Portrait Lord Nash
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is certainly true. My noble friend makes a very good point about parents. We have done a lot of work with parents in relation to online security and access to things such as pornographic material. Of course, schools engage with parents increasingly well, but the sad fact is that too many of our young people are brought up in homes where, frankly, the only brick in life is their school—and it is schools that have to take an increasing responsibility.

Adoption

Debate between Lord Geddes and Lord Nash
Tuesday 8th December 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Nash Portrait Lord Nash
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have just said that this was discussed in some detail last night.

Lord Geddes Portrait Lord Geddes (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I may have misheard my noble friend, but I thought that in his Answer he referred to misinterpretation of court judgments. Misinterpreted by whom?

Lord Nash Portrait Lord Nash
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We believe this may have been misinterpreted by some social workers with, I am sure, the best interests of children in mind. The president of the Family Division has clarified the meaning, particularly in Re B-S and in Re R, where he made it absolutely clear that the law on adoption had not changed. However, it seems that these decisions have sometimes been misinterpreted as raising the legal test for adoption so that adoption should not be pursued unless there is no other option. We are particularly concerned about this.